TL;DR
If reviews don’t change goals, pay, or growth, they’re noise. The fix isn’t “more meetings” , it’s choosing a method you can measure, normalize, and automate.
Below: quick wins for MBO vs OKR, when to use 360 vs 180, and how to make every review produce a development plan, calibration decision, and OKR update in one flow with Peoplebox.ai.
Performance reviews mainly see if workers’ output matches the company’s aims.
Bad review systems can:
- Slow growth because problems aren’t fixed.
- Give unfair results because they lack facts.
- Stress out HR because it’s hard to judge performance.
- Make staff quit because they don’t see career growth.
So, a solid review plan is key. Here are 12 ways to do reviews that will:
- Guide choices with real info.
- Start important talks that boost growth.
- Make plans to help workers get better at their jobs.
Getting the review method right is just the start. You also need a good system, like Peoplebox.ai, to easily set goals, handle performance, and keep your best people. Check it out!
| What are Performance Evaluation Methods? Performance evaluation methods are structured ways to assess results and behaviors over a period (quarter/half/year). Good methods link goals to evidence, reduce rater bias with structure, and produce actions (comp, promotion, coaching). Common models: MBO, OKRs, 180/360, BARS, 9-Box, Critical Incidents. |
Why are Performance Evaluations methods Necessary?
Performance evaluations aren’t just about appraisals; they’re powerful tools for continuous growth, skill development, and strategic workforce alignment. When done right, they offer multi-faceted benefits for both employees and organizations.
Bridge Skill Gaps Over Time
Performance evaluations provide structured, data-backed, and actionable feedback, ensuring that skill development is an ongoing process rather than a once-a-year conversation.
Example: Sales Team Coaching
Say you’re a sales manager watching your team’s client demos.If you see a rep using too much jargon and not linking features to what clients need, don’t wait for a yearly review.
Spotting this early means you can give them specific coaching. This helps them improve their pitch before it hurts sales.
Adapt Long-Term Goals as New Talents Emerge
Your employees are constantly learning, improving, and exceeding expectations. Sticking to rigid, outdated goals can hinder progress. Instead, evaluations help redefine objectives based on emerging skills.
Example: Lead Software Engineer
So, you’re reviewing a Lead Software Engineer, right? This guy’s code is top-notch and always on time. Everyone loves working with him; they say he’s a great leader and teammate. He’s killing it, so it sounds like he’s ready for more responsibility.
Also, reviews are good at spotting low performers who could use extra training before jumping into harder stuff. You can get them up to speed with some onboarding.
What are the Different Methods of Performance Management?
Now that you appreciate the multifaceted benefits, let’s equip you with the right performance management methodology tailored to your organization’s needs.
✅Management by Objectives (MBO)
This way of doing things means setting clear, measurable goals with people and checking in on how they’re doing. It makes things clear because reviews are tied to agreed-upon goals. It also lets you change goals if things change.
Management by Objectives (MBO) can be:
- Time-consuming: Goals need attention.
- Not all-encompassing: Some things don’t fit into goals.
- Good for clear results: Works if you know what you want but not for creative jobs.
When to use it:
Good for services, construction, and IT where you know what to expect. Also, good for startups that need flexible goals. It’s a good fit for businesses with a lot of number-based aims.
✅Objective and Key Results
OKRs are about hitting big, long-term targets, not just small, step-by-step ones like MBO. Objectives set these big goals, while key results are the smaller steps that help you get there.
How OKRs are better than MBO:
- Faster reviews: OKRs have quicker check-ins, so you can change things fast, unlike MBO’s yearly thing.
- Real impact:OKRs check if what you’re doing actually helps the business.
- Open to everyone:Since OKRs are visible to all, everyone knows what’s up and why it matters.
OKRs help remote teams stay on the same page all year. You can aim high but still focus on what you need to do now.
Use OKRs when:
- Your company is growing quickly, you need to keep everyone aligned.
- Your company is trying new things and wants your workforce to experiment.
- Your team is all over the place and wants to keep everyone in the loop.
| Suggested read: OKRs vs KPIs: What’s the Difference? |
✅180-Degree Feedback
This method of performance evaluation involves the employee and their direct manager. Employees review themselves and are also reviewed and rated by the latter, offering a mix of self-evaluation and perspective.
- Two Perspectives → Employees evaluate themselves while managers provide objective assessments.
- Encourages Self-Reflection → Employees gain deeper awareness of their strengths & areas for growth.
- Uncovers Hidden Development Areas → Managerial feedback highlights gaps that employees may overlook.
With Peoplebox.ai, managers can easily provide goal-focused feedback, ensuring data-driven evaluations and avoiding arbitrary assessments.
When to use it
You can use 180-degree feedback in any company, regardless of working style or size. It’s simple to set up and encourages discussion.
✅360-Degree Feedback
Another performance evaluation process is the 360-degree feedback method. You can get confidential feedback from all directions, managers, peers, and direct reports with this method. The main aim of this method is to reduce bias and increase the scope of perspective.
- More Views: Gets private feedback from different people.
- Less Bias: Offers a fairer review by reducing blind spots that come from just one source.
- Finds Hidden Issues: Spots strengths and weaknesses that managers might miss.
When to use it
- Leadership Assessments – Ideal for evaluating managers and executives.
- Cross-Functional Roles – Best for jobs that require collaboration across departments.
- Organizations Focused on Growth & Development – Encourages holistic performance improvement.
| Suggested Read: 15 Best 360 Degree Feedback Software and Tools In 2024 |
✅720-Degree Feedback
This is an expansion of 360-degree feedback that includes additional sources such as clients, suppliers, or board members. This method is even better because it incorporates client perspectives, which are missing from the 360-degree feedback method.
- Outside Input: Includes people like clients, suppliers, etc.
- Fairer: Outsiders aren’t stuck in office drama, so feedback is real.
- Client Focused: Helps workers get better with clients and see what they need to fix.
It can be hard putting all the feedback together. If a client gives a specific complaint, the worker might guess who said it, which ruins the point of being anonymous.
When to use it
- Customer-Facing Roles – Sales, account management, and customer success teams benefit immensely from external feedback.
- Senior Leadership & Executives – Feedback from board members, investors, and strategic partners helps in evaluating vision alignment & decision-making.
- Organizations Focused on Market Impact – If your company values external perception, this feedback method is a game-changer.
| Turn Insights into Action with Peoplebox.ai Transform reviews into measurable growth, not just meetings. Performance Check-ins: Replace yearly reviews with real-time progress tracking. Growth Trends: Visualize skill development with live, graphical dashboards. Data-Driven Coaching: Use actionable insights to close skill gaps and drive performance. 👉Run check-ins, feedback, and development plans all in one platform.Explore Peoplebox.ai |
✅Critical Incident Method
The critical incident method documents employee behaviors in high-impact situations over time, ensuring accurate, real-life insights into performance.
- Behavior-Based → Focuses on specific noteworthy incidents (both positive and negative).
- Reduces Recency Bias → Tracks actions over time, ensuring a comprehensive assessment.
- Highly Contextual → Gives detailed insights into how employees handle high-pressure situations.
When to use it:
- Customer-Facing Roles – Sales, customer service, and hospitality positions benefit from real-time behavior tracking.
- High-Stakes Decision-Making Jobs – Use this method in emergency response, healthcare, law enforcement, and consulting where quick thinking is crucial.
✅Checklist Method
This performance management methodology uses a predetermined checklist of metrics to evaluate employee performance. There are two main kinds of checklists.
- Developmental Checklist → Tracks skill growth & traits acquired over time.
- Demanding Events Checklist → Logs major work milestones & standout situations.
- Data-Driven & Objective → Ratings are based on predefined criteria, making comparisons easy and reducing subjectivity.
This method also makes it easy for you to outline the expected competencies and behaviors that every role carries. Since evaluators have to score employees on existing criteria, the data they collect is objective and easily comparable over time.
When to use it
- Metric-Driven Roles – Works best for jobs with clear, measurable outputs, like marketing, sales, finance, and operations.
- Process-Oriented Teams – Ensures compliance & standardization in regulated industries like healthcare, legal, and manufacturing.
✅Psychological Appraisal
This method leverages psychological tests and tools like personality and IQ tests to evaluate capabilities.
- Predicts Future Performance → Unlike traditional appraisals, this method focuses on potential, not past work performance.
- Data-Driven & Unbiased → Evaluations are conducted by qualified psychologists, reducing subjectivity and bias.
- Deep Insight into Employee Traits → Helps uncover hidden strengths, leadership qualities, and areas for development.
However, psychological appraisals are time-consuming to structure and may need to be customized for every employee. This makes it difficult to scale. Employees could also feel like their privacy is being invaded, as these evaluations go a lot deeper than analyzing work behaviors.
When to use it.
- Leadership & Executive Roles – Ideal for managers, directors, and senior executives, where strategic thinking and leadership traits are crucial.
- High-Potential Talent Development – Helps identify future leaders and craft career progression pathways.
✅Behaviourally Anchored Rating Scale
This method provides specific examples of effective and ineffective behaviors for each performance dimension.
- Objective & Structured → Uses predefined behavioral examples as “anchors” to rate employee performance.
- Focuses on Behaviors, Not Just Outcomes → Unlike checklists, BARS evaluates how an employee achieves results, not just if they did.
- Quantifies Qualitative Data → Converts subjective observations into measurable performance benchmarks.
However, creating the initial framework for this method is time-consuming, and the success of the evaluations depends on whether you have set the right anchors.
When to use it
The BARS approach could work for managers, leaders, and executives by tying leadership behaviors to team performance or business KPIs. For example, defining scales based on conflict management, change advocacy, or coaching.
✅Self-Assessment
In this method, employees complete their own appraisal process. This can include self-ratings across criteria and remarks which feed into formal evaluations.
It encourages employee ownership over development and illuminates potential blind spots between manager and employee perceptions. However, this method can lack objectivity, as there is only one assessor.
When to use it
The self-assessment method works best in businesses that rely on skilled individuals in charge of their goal setting, the ones completing specialized work independently. When experts have freedom over their tasks, managers cannot always fully see their strengths and weaknesses.
✅Peer Review
In a peer review, colleagues assess each other’s performance against set criteria during the review cycle. This provides additional perspectives that can be factored into appraisal decisions. This gives you more perspective beyond just manager insights which can be one-dimensional.
- Encourages Collaboration → Employees receive constructive feedback from those who work alongside them.
- Provides a Holistic View → Goes beyond managerial insights, offering well-rounded performance evaluations.
We understand writing peer reviews can be daunting. To help your team, we have curated a list of peer review examples you can share with your team right away for an effective review cycle.
When to use it
Peer reviews are ideal for team-based organizations where collaboration is essential to achieving goals. Getting input from colleagues mitigates biases and provides well-rounded insights.
- For Team-Oriented Roles → Ideal for environments where collaboration is key (e.g., project teams, creative teams, agile squads).
- When Manager Oversight is Limited → Helps fill gaps where managers may not see daily interactions.
Peoplebox.ai lets you conduct effective peer reviews within minutes. You can customize feedback, use tailored surveys, and seamlessly integrate it with your collaboration tools. It’s a game-changer for boosting development and collaboration in your team.
Which Performance Evaluation Method Works Best for You?
With the different methods of performance management available, each with its own unique strengths and limitations, it can get overwhelming to decide on any one or two. To simplify your decision, focus on a few key factors:
Objectives and Focus Areas
What are your main objectives and focus areas for conducting evaluations?
- If development and growth are the priority, then methods providing richer qualitative feedback like 360 reviews may be preferred.
- If compensation determination is the goal, quantified checklist ratings may align better.
- If the organization’s goals are focused on ambitious growth targets across different business areas, and the roles would benefit from being able to tie their work with the bigger picture, then use OKR.
Bandwidth and Resources
Multi-source feedback methods give you more comprehensive insights but require more time and effort to coordinate. Simpler checklists are easier to roll out if bandwidth is limited.
Methods relying on external psychologists or assessment centers also have higher associated costs.
| Peoplebox.ai removes any need for additional resources by fully automating performance reviews with robust OKR management, 360 feedback, customized evaluations, and real-time survey pulses. Our platform eliminates the manual effort of distribution, follow-ups, analysis, and reporting. What more? You can now conduct seamless performance reviews right within Slack. |
Employee Receptiveness
How receptive will your workforce be to different evaluation methods? If transparent culture is limited or trust amongst peers is low, open feedback methods may backfire.
Similarly, forced ranking and other comparative approaches could undermine psychological safety.
Ask: Will employees be open to this evaluation method?
- Transparent Culture? → Open feedback methods (e.g., peer reviews) work best.
- Low trust among peers? → Peer reviews may backfire if employees fear retaliation.
- Competitive environment? → Forced ranking methods may undermine team morale.
Organizational Culture
Aspects like your company’s communication norms and level of competitiveness also play a role in the optimal choice. Frequent open dialogue aligns better with coaching-focused methods for example, while incentive-driven cultures may embrace quantifiable achievement metrics more.
How does your company’s communication style and competitiveness influence the evaluation method?
- Frequent, open dialogue? → Use coaching-based feedback methods.
- Incentive-driven culture? → Use quantifiable metrics (score-based or OKR-driven evaluations).
